Anonymous
A Practical Comparison for Real-World AI Systems

n8n is an excellent tool for quick demos, internal automations, and getting workflows running in minutes. For many use cases, it does exactly what it promises.
However, when you move into production-grade AI systems—such as RAG pipelines, AI agents, streaming chatbots, and applications handling real user traffic—the limitations of visual workflow engines become apparent.
This is where LangGraph + LangChain + FastAPI consistently outperform n8n.
LangGraph and LangChain run natively in Python, while FastAPI is built for high-performance, asynchronous workloads.
Together, they provide:
By contrast, n8n's node-by-node execution introduces overhead as workflows grow. Once chains exceed 15–20 steps, latency and execution time become noticeable.
AI workflows are rarely linear. They involve:
LangGraph allows you to explicitly design state machines and agent behavior in code. You control how agents think, fail, retry, and resume.
In n8n, complex AI logic often results in sprawling visual graphs that are difficult to reason about, maintain, or debug.
Real-time streaming is essential for production chatbots and AI assistants.
With FastAPI WebSockets + LangGraph events, you can stream:
This leads to faster perceived responses and better user experience.
n8n can support streaming, but it typically requires workarounds that add complexity and fragility.
n8n introduces additional overhead through:
In contrast, a Python-based stack allows you to:
At scale, these differences significantly impact infrastructure spend.
LangChain typically adds support for new models—such as Gemini 3.0—almost immediately.
This enables teams to experiment and ship faster.
n8n support often lags behind, which can be limiting when model releases happen weekly and competitive advantage depends on early adoption.
LangGraph was designed specifically for:
These capabilities are native, structured, and predictable.
In n8n, recreating agent loops and reasoning flows often leads to brittle designs and difficult-to-maintain workflows.
Production AI systems change frequently. Testing and versioning are non-negotiable.
With Python-based workflows, you get:
n8n workflows are stored as JSON blobs, which are harder to diff, test, and review at scale.
Use n8n if you need:
Use LangGraph + LangChain + FastAPI if you're building:
n8n is excellent for automation and prototyping.
But for production AI systems—where performance, flexibility, streaming, cost control, and rapid model adoption matter—the Python stack scales better:
If your AI application involves agents, RAG, or real-time user interaction, LangGraph + LangChain + FastAPI is the more reliable long-term choice.